UK NEWS
ANGER OVER £81M TRANSPORT SCHEME
'Money-saving' transport scheme to cost £81m, watchdog warns
An efficiency drive designed to save £57 million is now likely to cost the Department for Transport (DfT) £81 million, a Government spending watchdog has said.
There was insufficient time to test a new IT system which then proved "unstable" when it went live, the report by the National Audit Office (NAO) said.
DfT staff told the NAO that people were being recorded as sick when they were not and that the information being produced was "garbage". Mix-ups led to one employee losing nine days' annual leave and others getting messages in German, the report revealed.
One member of staff said that before the new system was put in place the department achieved a prompt payment-to-suppliers target of 98% but this was now around 60%.
Commenting on the report, Edward Leigh MP, chairman of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, made a reference to the civil service chief in the BBC TV series Yes, Minister.
Mr Leigh said the DfT "has managed to implement an efficiency drive that would have been familiar to Sir Humphrey Appleby".
And NAO head Tim Burr said: "It is disappointing to see a programme which aimed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of a department leaving it -on current projections - some £80 million worse off."
The NAO report said the DfT had planned to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of services such as human resources, payroll and finance.
The department forecast that the programme, which involved delivery of a new IT system from IBM, would cost £55 million and achieve gross savings of £112 million.
The NAO said that in practice, the DfT could not agree a common set of business processes and the initial estimates proved optimistic. Supplier relations could have been better and inadequate testing of the system led to an unstable IT system being introduced.
SALE OF GOODS ACT
23.05.08, 11:53pm
The problem is that the government buy a system and after the deal is done keep changing the specification, adding on extras that the system wasn't designed to accommodate. If they drew up a proper requirement and stayed with that they might actually get a system that worked.
Posted by: freddie Report Comment
MUPPETS
23.05.08, 5:07pm
Do we all realise that these numptys are the same bunch that are planning massive databases, holding vast amounts of personal information on every single person in the country? They're not just incompetent but dangerous. IBM are one of the companies bidding for the national identity card implementation scheme as well, but even if they dont score we want to be really concerned about the other horses in the race as well. CSC, who are current favourites to win the contract. are one more American company vying for possession of our life history. Their Chairman and CEO is a Mr Michael W. Laphen who was recently appointed by George Bush as a member of NSTAC(National Security Telecoms Advisory Committee) in the U.S. Scary ****, eh? Another U.S. company EDS has a Chairman/CEO called Ron. A.Rittenmeyer who has an impressive portfolio, including membership of an organisation called Friends of Giuliani Exploratory Committee. Among these 'friends' are Win and Dave Rockefeller- the latter a member of the Bilderbergers and a Founder of the Tri-lateral Commission.Oh, and the Bush family. Some of this may have little significance to all but the most inquiring minds but we ought to be very afraid. Our govt is in cahoots with the richest and most powerful psychopathic elites on this planet, to take away any vestige of freedom we, and our children, still possess.
Posted by: ghostdog Report Comment
SALE OF GOODS ACT
23.05.08, 9:41am
If the Govt. have asked for a system to complete certain tasks and then the system fails to deliver, don't they have a good case to demand their money back from IBM?
Everytime a computer system is implemented in a Govt. Dept. it fails to deliver. Do they always use the same rubbish suppliers?
I expect they fall for the salesmans bullsh*t every time.
Posted by: jonocynic9 Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...