TWO WEEKS today will be the 40th anniversary of Enoch Powell’s famous “rivers of blood” speech.
Last week the all-party House of Lords Economic Affairs committee unanimously called for a cap on further immigration.
It also agreed that the mass immigration which engulfed this country after Powell’s warnings were ignored has produced no net economic benefits.
It’s a fair bet that none of the 16 peers responsible for this report ever said a word in support of Powell when the resolute action he urged could have prevented large parts of our country being colonised by millions of unassimilable aliens. The words “stable door” and “horse bolted” come to mind.
In his 1968 speech, Powell warned of “forces acting against integration” and “vested interests preserving and sharpening racial and religious differences”. He saw a “cloud no bigger than a man’s hand, which can rapidly overcast the sky” in the attempts by some immigrants to claim special communal rights.
With the expansion of the human rights industry, non-violent extremists play the system.
In particular, he feared the effects of granting legal rights whereby they “can organise their members to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens”.
Since then, billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money have been poured into the race relations industry and other agencies of multiculturalism. We have become accustomed to ranting hate-mongers of Muslim fundamentalism such as Abu Hamza taking advantage of Britain’s tolerant society to preach intolerance. While living on State benefits, he and others delight in biting the hand that feeds them.
In the past 10 years, with the expansion of the human rights industry, non-violent extremists have learned to play the system, too. Here’s a typical example: last week Bushra Noah, a 19-year-old trainee hairdresser, went to court claiming £34,000 in damages for “religious discrimination”. A hair salon had turned her down for a job because she refused to remove her Muslim headscarf while working.
Sarah Desrosiers, the salon owner, is a “fundamentalist” too. She thinks it is fundamental that stylists should display their own hair if they are to cut other people’s. Unfortunately, Ms Noah thinks her kind of fundamentalism takes precedence and is happy to bankrupt Ms Desrosiers to prove it. Perhaps this was one of the economic benefits of multicultural Britain Gordon Broon had in mind when he attacked the Lords report in Tuesday’s press conference.
Playing the game of “think of a number”, Broon claimed immigrants boosted the economy by £6billion, yet Home Office figures released this week claimed the net benefit to each of us amounts to only 58p a week, which Sir Andrew Green, of Migration Watch UK rightly derided as “roughly a Mars bar a week”.
All such figures are bogus, anyway. With immigration swelling the population by 190,000 a year, immigration is costing us all a fortune in benefits and creaking infrastructure such as schools and hospitals.
The figure of 190,000 actually understates the change taking place in Britain. We have about 600,000 immigrants a year but we also have 400,000 emigrants, many of whom are indigenous Britons fed up with rising crime, taxes and immigration. Official figures show one in 10 people in Britain was born overseas. The foreign-born population is growing rapidly through immigration and higher birthrates, whereas the British-born population is in decline.
In comparison to this, the economic consequences of immigration are irrelevant. Both culturally and physically, indigenous British people are inexorably becoming strangers in their own country. Meanwhile, the Government tries to disguise the reality with fig leaves such as its half-baked “Britishness” campaign.
Britain’s political independence is increasingly transferred to the EU. Meanwhile, at home, political correctness and multiculturalism gnaw away at our cultural identity.
Former Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith calls for a new bank holiday, British National Day, to boost pride in the country. What use are the symbols and trappings of nationhood if the nation itself is in the process of being abolished?
And although Trevor Phillips attempted to hijack the 'Rivers of Blood' speech anniversary by booking the old Midland Hotel, a number of people loyal to both Enoch and this Nation were also there on Sunday to ensure those that fleece the taxpayer in their pursuit of 'forced equality' did not have the 'whip hand' on this occasion.
IT SHOULD BE SIR ENOCH POWELL. AND WILL BE ONE DAY.
17.04.08, 2:33pm
Enoch will not be forgotten by those who share an understanding of what was/is happening to this land and her people. That is the most important factor when discussing Mr. Powell. He stood up for what was correct, and did not back down.
I REMEMBER THE RIVERS OF BLOOD SPEECH VERY WELL AND IT WAS NOT IGNORED BY THE PEOPLE - ONLY THE HEATH GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY AND LEFT WING TRENDIES TREATED POWELL AS A PARIAH: THE MORE COMMON SENSE PEOPLE TOOK TO THE STREETS TO PROTEST AGAINST HIS SACKING FROM THE GOVERNMENT.
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WASN'T IN FULL SWING IN THOSE DAYS BUT IT WAS CERTAINLY AROUND AND, AS WE ALL NOW KNOW, HAS BECOME INFINITELY WORSE.
MANY ON THIS SITE CASTIGATE BROWN AND HIS BUNCH OF BUNGLERS - AND QUITE RIGHTLY SO - BUT THE TORIES ARE BY NO MEANS BLAMELESS . REMEMBER, IT WAS HEATH WHO TOOK US INTO THE COMMON MARKET ON A LIE.
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TORIES AND LABOUR ON IMMIGRATION IS THAT THE TORIES WERE COWARDS WHO DID NOTHING ABOUT IT, AND LABOUR WHO SEEM TO REVEL IN DOING DOWN THE WHITE MAJORITY - AND THEY DID DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
b-to-b-I share your frustration regarding the deletion of comments.,regardless of which side of the political spectrum they come from.
I have found some to be particulary odious and on occasion vulgar ,
However I have always resisted the -report comment option -as I feel many of the offending comments show the hypocricy of the lefts claim that they stand for tolerance and fairness
I stated in a previous comment -
I fear the intent of those from the left far more than those coming from the right. An opinion that has been re-enforced by many of comments I have read on the HYS facility purportedly coming from those who's political stance represent the views of the left
SIR ENOCH POWELL
24.04.08, 11:42pm
What, are they knighting corpses?
Posted by: NickEd Report Comment
NO WHIP HAND FOR PHILLIPS
21.04.08, 2:51pm
And although Trevor Phillips attempted to hijack the 'Rivers of Blood' speech anniversary by booking the old Midland Hotel, a number of people loyal to both Enoch and this Nation were also there on Sunday to ensure those that fleece the taxpayer in their pursuit of 'forced equality' did not have the 'whip hand' on this occasion.
Posted by: GreenEngland Report Comment
IT SHOULD BE SIR ENOCH POWELL. AND WILL BE ONE DAY.
17.04.08, 2:33pm
Enoch will not be forgotten by those who share an understanding of what was/is happening to this land and her people. That is the most important factor when discussing Mr. Powell. He stood up for what was correct, and did not back down.
Posted by: GreenEngland Report Comment
LABOUR AND TORIES ARE AS BAD AS EACH OTHER
13.04.08, 10:05am
I REMEMBER THE RIVERS OF BLOOD SPEECH VERY WELL AND IT WAS NOT IGNORED BY THE PEOPLE - ONLY THE HEATH GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY AND LEFT WING TRENDIES TREATED POWELL AS A PARIAH: THE MORE COMMON SENSE PEOPLE TOOK TO THE STREETS TO PROTEST AGAINST HIS SACKING FROM THE GOVERNMENT.
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WASN'T IN FULL SWING IN THOSE DAYS BUT IT WAS CERTAINLY AROUND AND, AS WE ALL NOW KNOW, HAS BECOME INFINITELY WORSE.
MANY ON THIS SITE CASTIGATE BROWN AND HIS BUNCH OF BUNGLERS - AND QUITE RIGHTLY SO - BUT THE TORIES ARE BY NO MEANS BLAMELESS . REMEMBER, IT WAS HEATH WHO TOOK US INTO THE COMMON MARKET ON A LIE.
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TORIES AND LABOUR ON IMMIGRATION IS THAT THE TORIES WERE COWARDS WHO DID NOTHING ABOUT IT, AND LABOUR WHO SEEM TO REVEL IN DOING DOWN THE WHITE MAJORITY - AND THEY DID DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
THE REST IS HISTORY, FOLKS!
Posted by: jakman Report Comment
THANKS, LORIE
11.04.08, 2:42pm
You're spot on as always.
Posted by: back_to_basics Report Comment
RE- I WISH THE OFFENDING POST WAS STILL THERE
11.04.08, 2:00pm
b-to-b-I share your frustration regarding the deletion of comments.,regardless of which side of the political spectrum they come from.
I have found some to be particulary odious and on occasion vulgar ,
However I have always resisted the -report comment option -as I feel many of the offending comments show the hypocricy of the lefts claim that they stand for tolerance and fairness
I stated in a previous comment -
I fear the intent of those from the left far more than those coming from the right. An opinion that has been re-enforced by many of comments I have read on the HYS facility purportedly coming from those who's political stance represent the views of the left
Posted by: Lorie Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...