UK NEWS
LABOUR PEER 'AVOIDED £27M TAX BILL'
Lord Sainsbury
Lord Sainsbury has transferred £340 million worth of shares in an apparent attempt to save millions in tax, it has been reported.
The move will save the Labour peer and donor more than £27 million by avoiding impending controversial changes to the capital gains tax (CGT) regime, according to experts quoted by the Daily Telegraph.
The former science minister transferred 92 million shares he owns personally to a company he controls called Innotech Advisers, the paper reported.
This allows him to pay CGT at the lower rate of 10% before it rises to a flat rate of 18% on Sunday - £34 million compared to the £61.2 million he would be taxed if he sold the shares next week.
Lord Sainsbury will not himself profit from transferring the shares and intends to use the money for charitable donations, his spokesman said.
The spokesman said: "This will maintain the status quo and allow Lord Sainsbury to continue his current pace of his grant giving to charity."
In October, Chancellor Alistair Darling announced he would abolish the taper relief which allowed companies to pay CGT at a rate as low as 10% and instead impose a flat rate of 18% for gains over £1 million.
LABOUR PEER 'AVOIDED £27M TAX BILL'
01.04.08, 8:21pm
Having read this I just wondered, "Does Blair pay UK Tax on ALL his earnings " ?
Posted by: EmperorMing Report Comment
NOT PAYING HIS DUES SOMEONE SAID? IS THAT HOW WE LOOK AT IT WHEN WE SEEK TO REDUCE OUR TAX OWED WHEN TAX FILING TIME COMES AROUND?
01.04.08, 7:31pm
Why should there be one excuse for us and not for the wealthy? And a Lord to boot.
The common denominator is someone seeking to reduce taxes on personal wealth/income. I'd call that financial planning. Using your noggin. Wouldn't we all likewise take some action if we knew that impending change in law would increase our tax bite? Forewarned is forearmed. You'd do something. Lord Sainsbury did, and it was his privilege to do so. And not because of privilege.
I don't give a tinker's what charity he donates to. . He can give it all to Tony Blair for all I care. It's his business. Just as it is none of my business whether the Daily Express will write off the £500,000 it paid out in a libel award recently as the "cost of doing business" - for tax return purposes. It's all part of the annual attempt to save on taxes which we all indulge in.
Posted by: Rothaymere Report Comment
IS IT JUST ME OR HAS THE DE HABITUALLY MISSTATED FACTS IN ITS HEADLINES. "AVOIDED" A TAX BILL?
01.04.08, 7:18pm
If you were only given to reading headlines, you could be excused for getting things wrong about just about anything.
Avoided? Lord Sainsbury didn't avoid anything. He is taking advantage of current law to reduce a future tax bill. Isn't that what most of us do, if we can, when we prepare our taxes?
If my eyes serve me well I read:
'The move will save the Labour peer and donor more than £27 million by avoiding impending controversial changes to the capital gains tax (CGT) regime, according to experts quoted by the Daily Telegraph."
Impending speaks of the future not the present.
I once read a book on writing that had a significant warning: make sure your're before you're wrong when writing. The famous author scautioned that if you readers catch you out in just one error, it will cause everything you say to come into question. Quite possibly your readers could put you down. And forever.
I should take the same cautionary view of the Daily Express and its deliberately misstated facts in headlines. And put it down. Forever.
Posted by: Rothaymere Report Comment
I THINK NU LABOUR IS ONE OF THE MAIN CHARTIES HE DONATES TO
01.04.08, 7:08pm
How much of the £27m will end up in Nu Labour funds. Why do tax increases on things that effect the working class people always come in at midnight but tax changes that affect Nu Labour's rich friends are always delayed to allow them time to avoid the increases, stinks don't it.
Posted by: CAN Report Comment
LABOUR PEER 'AVOIDED £27M TAX BILL.
01.04.08, 2:19pm
1stly this is a quite legal move, is it not !
2ndly what an excellent fellow, if as he alledges, its going to be ploughed into the system, for what is understood by some to be beneficial to mankind ! It is supposed to be a democracy, capitalist, society we live in.
If it is not as stated that is his decision entirly !
Is there a note of jealousy here?
Posted by: juan01 Report Comment
A GENUINE ERROR
01.04.08, 11:04am
CAN'T WE GIVE LORD SAINSBURY THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT?
PERHAPS IT WAS AN ACCOUNTANCY ERROR: IT EASILY HAPPENS.
AS A PEER OF THE REALM HE MUST HAVE BEEN DEVASTATED AT NOT PAYING HIS DUES.
STILL, NEVER MIND, EH?
Posted by: jakman Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...