UK NEWS
SMITH ATTACKED OVER TERROR PLANS
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has been accused of undermining the fight against terrorism after publishing plans to extend the detention period for terror suspects.
Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats - in a far cry from the political consensus ministers originally pledged to seek - said her plans risked alienating Muslims and driving people to terrorism.
Ms Smith said she was still hopeful of winning cross-party agreement on the need to increase the pre-charge questioning limit from 28 days to 42. She added that she would get the legislation passed despite the threat of a backbench rebellion.
Asked what flashpoints would arise in the Bill's passage through Parliament, Ms Smith said: "I think that we will get this legislation on to the Statute Book. I don't envisage flashpoints as such."
Also unveiled in a new Counter Terrorism Bill were plans for a criminal offence of "communicating, publishing or eliciting" information about service personnel. Gathering details about members of the armed forces will carry up to 10 years' imprisonment if there was suspicion of a plot to place them in danger.
The issue of pre-charge detention led to Tony Blair's first defeat in the Commons in November 2005, when he sought a 90-day limit. A survey of Labour MPs by the Independent newspaper last month indicated that enough Labour MPs would vote against the new 42-day proposals for a Government defeat in the Commons.
Shadow home secretary David Davis said: "Last week, Jacqui Smith rightly highlighted the danger of radicalisation. Today, her fixation with extending pre-charge detention risks serving as a recruiting sergeant for terrorism."
He added: "The Government has not been able to present a shred of evidence to justify extending pre-charge detention, and there is now a range of evidence pointing the other way."
Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said: "The obsession with 42 days is undermining, not supporting, the battle against terrorism. Ministers are taking their reliance on hypothetical examples to new lengths as they attempt to cover up for the complete lack of genuine evidence for such a move.
Director of human rights group Liberty, Shami Chakrabarti, urged the Government to drop the policy, saying: "Despite ministerial promises of exceptional circumstances and so-called safeguards, the reality of this Bill is an on-off button for six weeks' detention without charge."
SMITH ATTACKED OVER TERROR PLANS
24.01.08, 8:09pm
Why have so many home secretaries come up with the same idea?
I think that it is just an excuse to detain people that are a threat to Labour, if you are at the front of a demonstration, you will be arrested and held while they probe your life. They will then hold you and convince a judge that you are a danger and hold you for longer. When they let you go, as they will do, you will not be entitled to nothing, no apology, nothing because they have the right in law. Nobody will want to be at the front of the demonstration and labour will have power forever. This is their goal and that's why we have to get them out soon. I will be at the front but I want Britain behind me.
Remember the old man at the labour party conferance, arrested under terror laws because they had no other way to remove him, didn't he have the look of a terrorist about him. That should have set bells ringing in most brains, it did in mine.
Posted by: Mike4224 Report Comment
WOORAM, BE CAREFULL WHAT YOU WISH FOR ?
24.01.08, 10:21am
Do you honestly think for one second,that the "TERROR" Laws are aimed at the british so called Muslim Terrorists ???/ , Afraid not ! more and more people are seeing through all this ? these new laws are intended for us, !! ALL OF US ! and that includes all the Sycophantic Labour supporters as well , no one , Just In case you did not get that , NO ONE IS SAFE FROM THE SOCIAL ENGINEERING WHICH IS TAKING PLACE ? WE ARE ALL TERRORISTS IN THE EYES OF THE GOVERMENT !!
Posted by: BratislavaUK Report Comment
I DON'T TRUST HER AT ALL
24.01.08, 10:17am
Its more likely that these laws will be used against British opposition(BNP) rather than Muslim extremists !
Posted by: BNP_Miller13 Report Comment
TERROR LAWS
24.01.08, 8:37am
This is the one time I agree with Jacqui Smith - if they are suspected terrorists, it doesn't matter how long they are held (apart from costing the taxpayer money), but at least they are not out on the street able (if they are guilty) to blow anyone up. In fact, I would go one further - if anyone is suspected, and there must be a reason they are taken in for questioning, then they should be on the first plane back to wherever they come from and no messing! The safety of the country is paramount!
Posted by: Wooram Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...