|
Columnists
![]()
|
HOME > NEWS / SHOWBIZ > UK NEWS > Brown's bank bail-out sends debt soaring to £92,000 for each family
UK NEWSBROWN'S BANK BAIL-OUT SENDS DEBT SOARING TO £92,000 FOR EACH FAMILYSaturday November 7,2009 By Macer HallTHE financial crisis is on course to send national debt soaring by a colossal £1.5trillion, official figures revealed yesterday.
The eye-watering sum, equal to more than £60,000 for each household, also equals Britain’s entire economic output for a year. It will take overall national debt to £2.3trillion – the equivalent of £92,000 for each of the country’s 25 million households – the Office for National Statistics revealed. Last night, the Conservatives blamed Gordon Brown’s stewardship of the economy for the extent of the soaring debt. RELATED... GAFFE EXPOSES LABOUR CHAOS ON IMMIGRATION HOUSE PRICES TO RISE 27% IN NEXT 5 YEARS CRACKDOWN ON MP GRAVY TRAIN 'MAY BE SCALED BACK' Tory MP Brooks Newmark said: “The Government is still trying to hide the full extent of Britain’s debt crisis. “They are in denial. Gordon Brown has messed up the public finances and our children will inherit this vast debt.” The debt surge was largely caused by the huge liabilities of banks such as Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Group being taken on to the public balance sheet. The Government has also offered £330billion in guarantees to the financial sector, the ONS said. Both liabilities come on top of a debt forecast by the Treasury of £792billion for the current financial year.
National debt has hit the limit of the range expected by the ONS. Treasury officials said the liabilities of the bank bail-outs were added for classification purposes. They said taxpayers would not be hammered with the full amount because the Government was aiming to sell off its stake in the banks. Officials said the ONS balance sheet only takes into account the liabilities of state-owned banks like Northern Rock and not their assets. Taxpayers would only pick up the bill if every single loan on the banks’ books went bad. But the measures taken added an extra £4.7billion to net borrowing in 2008 and a further £3.3billion in the first three quarters of this year – mainly from the extra money the Government needed to finance its intervention. In April, Chancellor Alistair Darling expected moves to prop up the banks would amount to a £50billion bill for the taxpayer. He now expects to revise this figure down in his forthcoming Pre-Budget statement. A Treasury spokesman said: “The Government’s interventions to support financial stability are temporary and exceptional and the liabilities of the banks who have been supported do not represent the long-term cost of these interventions to the taxpayer. “In the Budget, the Government estimated the long-term cost would be between £20billion and £50billion and the top of this range was included in our fiscal projections.”
|
|
|||||||||||||













BROWN CAN CALL FOR ALL THE...
07.11.09, 10:41pm
...'Global Contracts' he wants, but the rest of the World leaders are not listening to him.
What do the rest of you think about a nameless Civil Servant who 'accidentally signed away Gibraltar to Spain? The Spaniards must be laughing their heads off at us
Posted by: Disgruntled Report Comment
JOHNNO33 - HAD TO RESPOND, UNFORTUNATELY NO ON THE "IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY ... :"
07.11.09, 2:58pm
Take a gander over here. Unfortunately, the rare few who saw things clearly are saddled with a government others voted in. In your case, in the UK, Labour voted in 3 times!!
Your comment, "In any other country ..." does not speak of the United States. We are a democracy as is the UK, and in that regard, the majority vote counts. We cannot simply throw out a government which has been voted in for a definite period of time (for us until 2012). Britons have found that out. Labour refuses to hold an election. They don't have to. They rule.
I am wondering what the answer is to all this, when you live in a country where the disastrous government has been voted in and gleefully in Obama's case. With Brown, he is NOT an elected Prime Minister, his Labour cronies put him in. And booted out Tony Blair is set for a bonanza in Europe. It is my belief that he planned it all along. Throwing him out served his purpose. But throwing Brown in most definitely was not in the interests of the UK, as this enormous debt shouts loud and clear.
What to do? You cannot vote for your fellow man. And the downside is that you have to live with his vote. Labour voted in 3 times? It beggars belief. But you have to believe when you see - in black and white print - the reality of this massive debt. Those who voted Labour in 3 times saddled everyone else with this debt.
Posted by: Shenandoah Report Comment
TREVORD - GOOD AND ENLIGHTENING POST. ONCE I REALIZED THAT THE PEOPLE HAD VOTED IN LABOUR 3 TIMES, MY SYMPATHY EBBED, EXCEPT FOR THOSE LUMBERED WITH THEIR CHOICE
07.11.09, 2:48pm
I am an ex-pat living afar but always with my heart in England, Britain. The recent news of the squalor of the MP's, the reports of the disgraceful looting of taxpayers' money, and the arrogance of them, has ruined my morning many times when I've read the British newspapers. Still, I couldn't figure out the arrogance of this Labour Party. They seem to act like lords over a fiefdom. I asked how can this be? It's almost like a dictatorship in all but name. The Lisbon Treaty, sealed, signed, and delivered with a word from the British people. People wanting an election, immediately, and this self-absorbed, self-congratulatory government refusing - stay in your subordinate places people, we run the show.
Now your post has reminded me of what I learned just recently. Labour voted in 3 times? Were people asleep? Did they not read? Did they have no interest in who was imposing all these petty rules and regulations (exempting themselves from them of course)?
Now all is clear. You get the government you deserve. People here in the US are thinking about that as Obama's approval rating goes south. But voting in a party 3 times? Similar situation with the disastrous George W. Bush over here.
Unfortunately, the rest of us with more acumen, who read, pay attention, look around us, do something other than act like sheep, suffer the consequences. As a footnote, I fear for the UK with this Lisbon Treaty on the point of ratification, and looming down the road - President Blair.
Thanks for your post.
Posted by: Shenandoah Report Comment
'IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THIS CRETIN......
07.11.09, 2:46pm
....WOULD HAVE BEEN LONG GONE...,BY FAIR MEANS OR FOUL.
Posted by: johnno33 Report Comment
A FAIR CRITIQUE OF BROWN
07.11.09, 1:03pm
Brown's alleged brilliance as Chancellor over a 10 year period was always a smoke and mirrors illusion. He inherited a great financial position from the Tories in 1997 and immediately started stealth taxing to fund a public sector spending spree. When he ran out of money and coudn't think of any more stealth taxes to use to steal our money, he started borrowing to continue his spending spree. He is in reality the most inept Chancellor this country has seen in a long long time, and an equally incompetent PM who proved within 3 months of knifing Blair in the back to get his job that he didn't have the ability to do it.
As for "I have ended Boom and Bust", that - together with his overactive imagination that he is a world-class leader - clearly illustrates the deluded planet he is living on.
The net result is that he has got this country in the biggest financial mess I have seen in my 65 years - even surpasing that of Wilson who had to devalue the pound and go begging to the IMF.
One can only blame the idiots who voted Labour in for a third term. They got the government they deserved. Unfortunately, the rest of us got it too.
Posted by: TrevorD Report Comment
QUICK EXAMPLE OF BROWN'S PRUDENCE
07.11.09, 11:41am
1) Brown sells of much of our gold reserves at boot sale prices.
2) Brown,over the last few years,gives India £2 BILLION in aid (whilst India spends £2 Billion on a nuclear submarine. Apart from that they have enough money to build and maintain a nuclear arsenal and send rockets to the moon,whilst our finest are getting killed for lack of funding)
3) India buys 200 tons of gold from the IMF.
The man is either trying to wreck the whole country,or is the most incompetent bloke the world has ever seen.
It must be one or the other
Posted by: JackPershing Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...