Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 18°C
London
Saturday 30th August 2008 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

UK NEWS

DIANA'S FEAR OF MURDER

Story Image


CONSPIRACY: Dodi Fayed's father Mohammed believes Diana was pregnant with his son's child

Tuesday July 10,2007

By Richard Palmer, Royal Correspondent

A LETTER in which Princess Diana claimed Prince Charles wanted her killed will be presented in evidence in full for the first time at her inquest.

In the ten-page document she chillingly reveals her growing fears for her life, saying: “My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car.”

She also claims the heir to the throne wanted her dead so that he would be free to marry Camilla. Extra pages of the letter, which have never been made public, were found by lawyers investigating her death.

The full hand-written letter had originally been presented as just one sheet of paper but it is actually ten sides long and covers five sheets. A preliminary hearing  at the High Court in London yesterday was told that Scotland Yard detectives investigating the death have given conflicting accounts of how much of it they have seen.

Now a fuller version of her own words will be heard at the inquest, which starts on October 2. However, it is not clear whether the jury will be able to see the entire document.

ì
This particular phase of my life is the most dangerous
î

Diana, Princess of Wales


The letter was written 10 months before Diana died in a 1997 Paris car smash with her boyfriend Dodi Fayed. Her former butler Paul Burrell said she gave it to him as insurance.

In the brief excerpt that has been released to the public, she writes: “This particular phase of my life is the most dangerous. My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the
path clear for him to marry.”

However, Operation Paget – the £3.69million Scotland Yard inquiry  which concluded that Diana died in an accident – dismissed the letter, saying it found no evidence to support her concerns.

SEARCH UK NEWS for:


But Michael Mansfield, QC, for Dodi’s father Mohamed Al Fayed, told the hearing yesterday: “The Paget report never does indicate it saw the original, and there are differing police recollections as to whether they did so.” He asked for tests to find indentations that might reveal the existence of a still-concealed top page containing a date and the name of the intended recipient.

The development came as the coroner overseeing the inquest rejected calls for the Queen and Prince Philip to be questioned as witnesses. Lord Justice Scott Baker’s decision infuriated lawyers trying to investigate claims that Diana was murdered.

He insisted it was neither appropriate nor necessary to ask Philip about letters he is said to have written to the Princess and to question the monarch about a warning that she is alleged to have given Mr Burrell about “dark forces” at work.

The refusal came despite claims by Mr Al Fayed that the couple were murdered in an MI5 plot masterminded by the Duke of Edin­burgh because Diana was pregnant with Dodi’s child.

Philip refused to cooperate with the Scotland Yard inquiry led by ex-Metropolitan Police Commis­sioner Lord Stevens, insisting he had nothing useful to add.

Mr Mansfield urged the coroner to help uncover the truth about Philip’s letters, which were said to have upset Diana.
“You may be able to approach him on behalf of the inquest and inquire into truth,” he said. “Ob­vious inquiries are, firstly, whether he was aware of any of the fears she has expressed and, two, whether he did send letters of the kind described in the Paget report.”

But Lord Justice Scott Baker said: “It doesn’t seem to me that any further inquiries at this stage would be appropriate or necessary.” But he said he would “keep the position under review”.

Last night Mr Al Fayed vowed to press ahead with efforts to obtain evidence from the Royal Family, which he says will support his murder claims.

“The coroner may believe it is not appropriate nor necessary but we believe it is,” said a spokesman for the Harrods tycoon. “At some point we’re going to have to have answers. We’re not going to let this drop.”

Another mystery surrounding the case has also been the allegation that a white Fiat Uno caused Diana’s chauffeur-driven Mercedes to veer out of control.

There have been claims that it belonged to James Andanson, a photographer who was later found dead.

His burnt corpse was found in the wreckage of a car in France in what appeared to be suicide.

However, a witness has now come forward to say he believes that Andanson had two bullet holes in his head.

Mr Mansfield also claimed there was a witness, Jacques Morrell, who saw Mr Andanson in Paris on the night of the crash. He said: “There are witnesses who indicate he was in Paris. Whether he was driving a white Fiat Uno is a separate matter.

“Part of (Morrell’s) identification of Andanson comes from something that is referred to as confidential reports.”
He said it was not clear what these confidential reports were, and urged the court to request the information from investigators.

The hearing was also told that a marquee will be set up in the courtyard of the High Court to accommodate hundreds of journalists and members of the public who will want to see the full inquest.

The next preliminary hearing will be held on July 27.


User Image

WHAT IS MURDER

15.07.07, 5:11pm

There's murder and then there's murder.
I doubt that Diana's death was a deliberate act of murder on that night - though I wouldn't even begin to be surprised if it turned out to be such.
However, what I have no doubt whatsoever about is that the behaviour of Diana's cruelly unkind and self-obsessed husband Charles, of Charles's ruthless mistress Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles, of the cold uncaring Queen, of the vitriolic Philip, and of the rest of the members of the 'Royal' Family, are why Diana ended up dead.
Does that constitute murder?
In my view yes.

• Posted by: JudySReport Comment

User Image

IRREGARDLESS OF THE FACT DIANA WAS NOT PREGNANT, SHE WAS MURDERED!

10.07.07, 6:11pm

Unfortunately for Dodi Fayed, he just happened to be with Diana that fateful night. Whilst I do empathize with his father, he should seek justice for his son and his rights--and not as the "intended" of Diana--that was never to be (if Ms Marks' father had not died, Diana would not have been with Dodi; he was just a fling! Remember, his fiance was on a nearby yacht at the time of the 'romance'.)
Having said that, if Diana was any other person on the planet, who left such a trail of evidence of the fact that she would be murdered (i.e., letters, notes and even an interviw with Ingrid Seward), and the Murder came to pass, the suspected party (Charles) would be in prison right now! What about Diana's rights as a human being, Mr. Stevens? What makes her lesser than because she had the misfortune of, as teenage girl, to marry the person who would be instrumental in her demise?

• Posted by: WriterReport Comment

User Image

DIANA KNEW THE WORKINGS OF THE RF

10.07.07, 5:51pm

Princess Diana was in the way, never mind the fact that she knew so much about the RF themselves. She could have told much much more...I believe that Diana knew that the possibility of assassination was there and she took the time to let the people know it could happen.. She told it from her perspective but she was right on, regardless of the naesayers..
Charles wanted life on his terms and that included Camilla, the selfish bas*ar*d...
Deciding to find a life for herself on the world stage, put the RF into a great fear... Diana was going to "represent" the monarchy and not to their liking..but would take her seriously and they would find that she was not the "mentally" challenged princess that they the RF were trying to pass off!! Diana frightened them... not only the possibility that she might marry a "dark skinned" Arab, and have a child in that union, but that the world would take her seriously above them...What a bunch of fools the RF are....They let the best thing , that happened for them in years, go... She had ever right and was correct in her assumption that they wanted her dead!! Come on, Prince Harry - Look beyond what you have been brainwashed in for these past 10 years!!!

• Posted by: KateReport Comment

User Image

CLARIFICATION

10.07.07, 3:06pm

To the previous poster BEEGEE...

Princess Diana was not a mentally disturbed woman as you allege. This fiction was hatched by Prince Charles and his Favorite poodle Penny Junor and their smear tactic carries no weight in fact or reality. Diana was right to fear the vicious, sinister forces of the Secret State who will stop at nothing including assassination to uphold their corrupt regime.

I know only too well how it feels to be attacked, ambushed and character assassinated by the Secret State and their tame media assets. I have fought many battles against the vile British Establishment and one has to be just as ruthless as they are to survive and win! Being a part of this colossal battle to uncover the truth behind Diana's murder is a privilege but I am only too aware of the possible consequences but I fight on nonetheless.

However, I agree, the time has come to "get rid" of the Monarchy and Britain should become a Republic governed by an elected Head of State. Interesting that in a 'democracy' our so-called 'representatives' will allow no Parliamentary debate on a Referendum on the Monarchy.

The Establishment forces are powerful and strong but they are also aware that forces just as strong are growing up to defy and defeat them. Within a few years we will take lawfully all the power in Britain and cast the House of Windsor and its parasites into the dustbin of history, from whence it came!

We must be positive, united, strong and indefatigable. Have we forgotten why we fought a Civil War in this country? The reason being to get rid of an unelected Head of State who believed he had a divine 'right to rule'. History turns in cycles....

www.news-alliance.com
www.republic.org.uk

• Posted by: news_allianceReport Comment

User Image

PREMONITION

10.07.07, 2:07pm

I would love the royal family to be implicated in Diana's death then perhaps we could get rid of them all. Unfortunately I think that most of the stuff that has been written about Diana and Dodi's deaths has been conjecture and fantasy. How romantic it would be if they had been murdered by the 'jealous husband'. Charles could have Camilla any time he wanted so why would he need to murder Diana? Phantom cars in the tunnel, paparazzi, MI5, 'The Firm' involved in a conspiracy to murder? What a load of rubbish. Diana was a flake who wrote and spoke a lot of rubbish so who can believe one word of this letter? Lets get this thing over with and let this rather disturbed young woman rest in peace. Diana died in a tragic car crash that was almost certainly caused by the erratic driving of the chauffeur nothing more. R.I.P

• Posted by: BEEGEEReport Comment

User Image

DIANA'S FEAR WAS REALISED AND NOW WE MUST HAVE THE TRUTH!

10.07.07, 1:32pm

Princess Diana's fear that she would be murdered in road traffic 'accident' (RTA) was realised on 31 August 1997.

It is now imperative for anyone who cares about the truth in this matter to bring greater public pressure to bear on Lord Justice Scott-Baker.

We urge everyone who reads this column to sign our online Diana Inquest Petition at www.news-alliance.com

We will then send a copy of your petition to Lord Justice Scott-Baker before the Inquest begins in October. Just a few moments of your time could make a very difference.

Thank you all.

www.news-alliance.com

Diana Inquest Petition for the truth!

• Posted by: news_allianceReport Comment

View All Comments

To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...

Share...

Got A Story? Get in touch online
Email the news desk directly here!


BA offers Scots second-class service, says MP

A SCOTTISH MP claimed yesterday that British Airways is treating Scottish passen...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

'Personalised learning' plan unveiled

A series of measures aimed at boosting education and helping young people is to ...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(1)

Fish and chips break £5 barrier

FISH and chips are in danger of becoming an expensive treat rather than a family...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(1)

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year