UK NEWS
SCHOOLS AT MERCY OF BANNED PUPILS
By John Chapman
UNRULY pupils thrown out of school are often allowed back on appeal, an official report showed yesterday.
Headteachers are being frustrated at being overruled as they try to get tough on yobs.
Suspensions from secondary schools for threatening teachers, attacking other pupils or disrupting lessons were up 14,000 last year – four per cent – compared with the previous year. In England, secondary pupils were excluded 343,840 times in 2005/06, according to the Department for Education.
Education minister Jim Knight said this showed schools were getting tough on unruly youngsters.
But Mick Brookes, of the National Association of Head Teachers, warned that reinstating an expelled pupil can create “havoc”.
It sent a message that disruption was acceptable and led teachers to take action in protest. Mr Brookes said: “The child continues to disrupt the education of others.” He said the pupil put back may think “I can do what I want because you are not allowed to exclude me.”
Almost a quarter of appeals against expulsion were successful and, in these cases, more than half the pupils returned to their school.
John Dunford, of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “Heads need and deserve better support than this if they are to maintain standards of behaviour.”
HARSHER PUNISHMENT!
27.06.07, 2:46pm
Pupils who 'continuely' use bad behaviour in the classroom should have an alternative classroom set aside for them so that when they return on appeal they should prove their willingness to learn like all those pupils who want to study and learn more but who cannot because the teachers are spending more time trying to sort out those children who are unruly and who disrupt those who do wish to study and learn.
Thinking back to when I was at school, I remember the children who were unruly, they looked forward to being suspended from school because they just did not want to attend for different reasons, particularly when they began dating. I don't think suspending them is the answer, but a harsher punishment is needed. Perhaps by not suspending them but they should be be set aside from the rest of the other pupils in a different classroom maybe, so that they're not likely to disrupt the others and when they can prove that they are more willing to learn with their other class mates, then only should they return again.
Posted by: SmileyRose Report Comment
IS ‘EXCLUSION’ THE ANSWER TO ‘UNRULY’ PUPILS?
27.06.07, 1:28pm
In many cases they (the pupils in question) probably feel that they are actually getting an extra ‘holiday’ so being suspended or expelled is hardly a punishment!
Parents of ‘disruptive’ pupils must therefore be made to pay the price and take responsibility for their children, NOT the teachers/schools and children who actually want to learn!
Posted by: Cynical_sid Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...