TONY Blair’s final act as Labour leader was in keeping with the rest of his premiership.
His conduct at the latest European Union treaty negotiations had all the familiar hallmarks of Blairism: spin, hollow rhetoric and the destruction of Britain’s national interests.
Before he left for Brussels, Blair adopted a sub-Thatcherite pose as the heroic defender of our independence, boasting in pseudo-military terms that there were certain “red lines” that he would not allow the EU to cross.
All too predictably, however, he proceeded to surrender meekly to the forces of European integration, signing a deal that further undermines British sovereignty. Then he tried to present his capitulation as some sort of triumph for his diplomacy.
We have been putting up with this mix of deceit and propaganda for the 10 years. But the Brussels agreement is a particularly spectacular and shameful example of Blairite fraud.
Blair has signed away our powers, identity and right to govern ourselves.
Because, far from protecting our nationhood, what the outgoing Prime Minister has done is to hasten the destruction of our country’s liberty under the steamroller of the unelected, bureaucratic European Union.
The treaty he endorsed is no minor, tidying up exercise. It is the blueprint of a new political entity, the United States of Europe, complete with a President, foreign policy, defence system, executive, diplomatic service and laws which will over-ride the autonomy of member states. Thanks to this deal, Britain is rapidly becoming little more than a region within the nation of Europe.
Blair has signed away our powers, identity and right to govern ourselves. It is a reflection of the profoundly undemocratic nature of the European Union that, if the Government has its way, we in Britain are not going to be given any say over the obliteration of our autonomy.
During the negotiations over the ill-fated EU constitution in 2004, Blair promised a referendum on the outcome. As it turned out, the EU constitution was heavily rejected by the voters of France and Holland before it even reached Britain, so it appeared to have died an unlamented death.
Yet the European enthusiasts are far too arrogant and fanatical to allow the creation of an EU super-state to be halted by a small matter such as the will of the people. If the electorates of member states refuse to accept the scheme for political integration, then they should simply be ignored or bypassed.
And this is precisely what has happened with the EU constitution. Having been thrown out by Dutch and French voters, it has simply resurfaced as a so-called “amending” treaty.
Almost everything that was set out in the planned 2004 constitution is in the new Brussels agreement. Among the more sinister clauses are sweeping new powers for the European Court of Justice over our domestic criminal policy, including even the sentencing for offenders, as well as increased EU control over immigration and social security.
These provisions make a mockery of the idea that we are still an independent nation. And Blair’s noisy talk about the opt-outs he has secured for Britain is just meaningless bombast.
For instance, the declaration that the Charter of Fundamental Rights will not take precedence over British law is nothing more than a political aspiration. As Blair should know, our opt-out has no real legal power.
Indeed, one Italian EU expert described it as a legal “nonsense”. The same is true of Britain’s other exemptions, which will soon be rendered an irrelevance by the onward march of federalism.
The pro-Europeans openly admit they have now managed to introduce the constitution by the back door, without the tiresome business of having to achieve any electoral mandate for these drastic changes. The era of the nation state is over in Europe. We are now to be governed by a new German-led bureaucratic empire.
It is no wonder that the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the true architect of this political settlement, could be seen grinning from ear to ear this weekend. She was the one who first suggested that the constitution could be imposed by presenting it as nothing more than a treaty proposal.
With the connivance of the rest of Europe’s leaders, she pulled off this coup, consigning our national identities to the dustbin of history.
The only way to halt this descent into subservience would be to hold a referendum.
In contradiction of all their previous pledges, the Government has ruled one out. Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett justified this refusal by claiming that we live in a parliamentary democracy and so referenda are not the British way.
This is an absurdity. For a start, we had a referendum on our membership of the Common Market in 1975.
Moreover, under Labour we have a string of votes on everything from the creation of the Scottish Parliament to the appointment of a Mayor of Hartlepool. And the continued survival of Britain as an independent nation is a little more important than the arrangements for Hartlepool’s municipal governance.
The Government doesn’t want a vote because it knows that we would reject the treaty.
Such reasoning only shows that the EU is a gigantic exercise in the abuse of power.
In the Seventies, the politicians told us we were joining a free trade association, not an embryonic United States of Europe. We have been living with deception and duplicity ever since as our own country disappears.
BLAIR.THE EXPRESS WOULD NOT SHOW MY OPINION OF HIM.
28.06.07, 9:59am
Blair and the walking letterbox make a pile of dog poo look appealing.
If being so called smarter means robbing people and taking away their rights and freedom of the vote and selling the country away from under their feet, allowing overwhelming amounts of foreigners in and changing religion to a less tolerant form, simply for power, money and glory then I am glad I am not a Scot. But you know what they say about SPIN what goes around comes around and the gravity of it like water will find its natural level again, covering all those who think they were being smart in their own sediment. Proud to be English! Vote EDP in the next election.
It's our fault for letting him getting away with it,
we could see how chummy he was getting when they started giving him their villas for the freebie holidays. All those passionate visions became a reality, but to whom, we are being tied
into something we do not want and are not even being given a voice, by way of thea referendum
we were promised, why is that and who is afraid of upsetting whom? Jjust a treaty ? with the main points in place that makes it still, when complete, a constitution what else would you call it ,its still something that we should have our say
BLAIR.THE EXPRESS WOULD NOT SHOW MY OPINION OF HIM.
28.06.07, 9:59am
Blair and the walking letterbox make a pile of dog poo look appealing.
Posted by: rozipoz Report Comment
GIVE US A VOTE ON THE EU TREATY
27.06.07, 9:19pm
Yes, he was a good symbol about as good as a turd in a swimming pool and now we have got the one who put it their.
Posted by: Derk Report Comment
AH LEAVE HIM BE
27.06.07, 12:33pm
Actually, he's never been that bad a Prime Minster in my humble opinion.
Posted by: glenn Report Comment
WHATEVER
27.06.07, 12:30pm
Sorry, but i don't agree!
Posted by: glenn Report Comment
GIVE US A VOTE ON THE EU TREATY
26.06.07, 11:01pm
If being so called smarter means robbing people and taking away their rights and freedom of the vote and selling the country away from under their feet, allowing overwhelming amounts of foreigners in and changing religion to a less tolerant form, simply for power, money and glory then I am glad I am not a Scot. But you know what they say about SPIN what goes around comes around and the gravity of it like water will find its natural level again, covering all those who think they were being smart in their own sediment. Proud to be English! Vote EDP in the next election.
Posted by: Derk Report Comment
GIVE US A VOTE ON THE EU TREATY
26.06.07, 5:36pm
It's our fault for letting him getting away with it,
we could see how chummy he was getting when they started giving him their villas for the freebie holidays. All those passionate visions became a reality, but to whom, we are being tied
into something we do not want and are not even being given a voice, by way of thea referendum
we were promised, why is that and who is afraid of upsetting whom? Jjust a treaty ? with the main points in place that makes it still, when complete, a constitution what else would you call it ,its still something that we should have our say
Posted by: Maggie Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...