|
Columnists
![]() ![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYDo we need much tougher security checks on refugees?FURIOUS MPs demanded an immediate inquiry into airport security yesterday as it emerged that an infamous Afghan hijacker is now working at Heathrow. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
| Wednesday 3rd December 2008 | ![]() |
Make us your HOME PAGE | ![]() |
What is RSS? |
|
Columnists
![]() ![]()
|
ARTICLE SUMMARYDo we need much tougher security checks on refugees?FURIOUS MPs demanded an immediate inquiry into airport security yesterday as it emerged that an infamous Afghan hijacker is now working at Heathrow. |
|
|||||||
SECURITY CHECKS ON REFUGEES
01.06.08, 6:17pm
Well said torres.if your white your checked and double checked. but not if your not.we dont want to be seen as "racist".
Just how many "refugees" disapear into the woodwork .and are working today in all manner of jobs????
Posted by: Redlady Report Comment
YES WE DO
31.05.08, 7:14pm
Our airports have become one of our "security sensitive" areas ... every one who works there should be security checked......
But go to Heathrow .... as you are checked by "security" ... spot the white face ...... why are we handing over over our security to the people who are our biggest threat ???
Posted by: torres Report Comment
TIP
28.05.08, 6:14pm
if you are an example of 'local people' i would not want to mix with you either.
hear about the anti-immigrant riots and assaults on the weekend?
not exactly a warm welcome, was it?
Posted by: crayfishbanker Report Comment
REFUGEES
26.05.08, 8:36pm
These people are not refugees they are scroungers and should be sent back especially this Afghan man. We do not want them here, they cause trouble and will never mix with the local people. They are trouble with a capital T and the government should clamp down now on all immigrants.
Posted by: Tip Report Comment
NO
25.05.08, 8:20am
we should only allow female refugees, with two children, one female, one male, men, single people, need to make every effort to rid their land of evil. tough decisions must be enforced for our own security.
Posted by: WHAT4 Report Comment
REFUGEES
22.05.08, 10:07pm
Actually,we don't need any refugees.
Posted by: redwhiteandblue Report Comment
YES YES YES
21.05.08, 9:02pm
HOW MANY MORE TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU.
Posted by: debbieharry Report Comment
WHAT A STUPID QUESTION
21.05.08, 1:34am
THEY ARE ALREADY HERE, INFILTRATING OUR SOCIETY, AND CORRUPTING THE INNOCENT.
Posted by: supernova Report Comment
SEE GORDON BROWN
20.05.08, 6:11pm
its his loony government who is letting all the refugees into this country,
their coming in and doing what they like,
of course they have the human rights to fall back on if anything goes wrong,
Posted by: jessica Report Comment
TONAUD
20.05.08, 1:58pm
you talk rubbish:
"when we have so many of OUR people cannot get a job in there own Country"
there are 700 000 job vacancies in this country. plenty of work is out there, it is just not 'desireable' work for britons.
i will dwell on this statement in full:
"Why is it that these people can get jobs at all when many of theme are illiterate by our normal standards when we have so many of OUR people cannot get a job in there own Country?"
--interesting how people who cannot spell the word 'them' or use the word 'their' properly can accuse other people of being illiterate. i won't even mention your horrible grammar.
maybe that's why you can't find a job.
Posted by: crayfishbanker Report Comment
TONAUD RACISM
20.05.08, 9:19am
You have mentioned the word and maybe at some point racism should be dealt with, looked at, to see what it actually means.
We all are supposed to know what it means but unfortunately the whole racist issue is taken way out of context.
I actually see many differences between races as cutural rather than being racist.
Maybe race is now an oudated issue.
Posted by: marigold Report Comment
INSANITY
20.05.08, 8:17am
There has been a huge problem building up for our Country for many years now and no attempt has been made by our so called government to tackle this very sad state of affairs.Itmust be said that NO political Party has the slightest interest in dealing with anything that might smack of racism (there Ive said it ,that drea
dfull word everyone seems so terrified of)>There is no way that security checks can make us all safe from these uninvited guests of ours ,practically evrything about them is and will remain unknown.The Blairs deliberatelly avoided this tragic situation and left us all to reap the harvest of hate they encouraged.Unfortunately Mr Brown reads from the same script,no security there then.Why is it that these people can get jobs at all when many of theme are illiterate by our normal standards when we have so many of OUR people cannot get a job in there own Country?and THEY are certainly not a securit risk. No we live in a time of sheer insanity , much of it created by this incompitent ,uncaring conmen known as New Labour ,God help us all.
Posted by: tonaud Report Comment
CHECKS NEEDED ON MPS
19.05.08, 7:28pm
DO WE NEED MUCH TOUGHER SECURITY CHECKS ON ........ ????
Yes, we do need checks but on the memebers of the House of Conmen to find out how much money they have made after they became MPs and the allowances they might have misappropriated.
Posted by: Nalin Report Comment
NICKED
19.05.08, 9:14am
In order to escape a vile and repressive country this man put at least 173 lives in danger.
If this plane had crashed would you still be backing him ?
Hijackers should not be allowed to stay here in Britain. To do so only reinforces to others the validity of commiting such a crime.
Posted by: marigold Report Comment
INDEED
19.05.08, 8:45am
The chap committed a crime to escape from one of the most vile and repressive countries in the world, asked for asylum after serving his time, and is now making a contribution to society in his new home.
You're confusing the nominally democratic, nominally peaceful Afghanistan with the place you or I would have done anything we could to get out of that he actually left.
Posted by: NickEd Report Comment