Scottish Sunday Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 3°C
London
Wednesday 3rd December 2008 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?
Have Your Say - User Comments

ARTICLE SUMMARY

Should all signs in Britain be in English?

SO much information is being translated for migrants that they no longer need to learn to speak English, a minister finally admitted yesterday.

SHOULD ALL SIGNS IN BRITAIN BE IN ENGLISH?

28.12.07, 7:02pm

The simple answer is yes - and I would include Welsh as well, apart from points of entry into the UK. As far as other non British languages are concerned, there is no place for them. Learn English if you live in the British Isles. In Spain, even in places where there is a large permanent expat population, there are no road signs in English!

• Posted by: FrancisharmonyReport Comment

ALL SIGNS IN ENGLISH

22.12.07, 7:43pm

Well, if nothing else, those road signs in Polish prove beyond doubt that there are far too many Poles in this country.

• Posted by: JaneRobertsReport Comment

WATCH OUT THERE JOCK

20.12.07, 6:03pm

making sensable points will get you nowhere here. especially being scottish. the nationalists here do not like that one bit.

they do like making a big deal out of a non-issue though... love it. almost as much as they love hating.

• Posted by: VinceReport Comment

SHOULD ALL SIGNS IN BRITAIN BE IN ENGLISH?

20.12.07, 5:15pm

No


Wales and Scotland have their own languages and which languages are used should be the decision of the local authority and reflect the make up of the local popualtion,but English SHOULD always be one of the languages ,since it is recoginised universally,and the language of MOST UK Citizens .
It does not make sense to exclude a langauge of a large ethnic population simply because the English dont understand it!Its not for your benefit.
A bit less arrogance England and maybe relations might improve,

• Posted by: JOCKINTHEBOXReport Comment

User Image

ENGLAND ENGLISH

20.12.07, 3:56pm

What the bloo d y hell is going on here? I work all over the world and everywhere any negotiations are being carried on between two different language speakers then it is in English.

All nations use English as the default language when they deal with any other national trading partner!
English is the language of Science, Aviation, Maritime, it is the worlds preferred communication language. Here in its birthplace our political traitors have betrayed our nation and all we stand for.

B A S T A R DS

• Posted by: anglosaxon1Report Comment

User Image

NO THEY SHOULDN'T

20.12.07, 12:30pm

They should be in the language of the people from Pakistan and Banglasesh. After all these people are having 5 children on average compared to the indigenous Britions' 1.2 so it's only a matter of time before they become the majority.

So unless a certain party gets in power, then why not save ourselves some time and change the roadsigns now?

• Posted by: CharlesTreeReport Comment

ENGLISH

18.12.07, 12:30pm

is the language of money, it is perhaps the most useful language to learn. part of the attractivness of britain to immigrants is the ability to learn english (its a main reason whaty so many foreign students come here). to suggest it is under threat is completely moronic. every non-english speaking country in the world is worried about how influential the english language is, and here we've got no-marks complaining that its being threatened.

dim, to say the least.

• Posted by: VinceReport Comment

User Image

VINCE THE TROLL

18.12.07, 8:46am

Vince said "this whole 'sign's in english' was never an issue in the first place, but a non-issue put forward to stir hysteria about something that is not going to happen."

Spoken like a true lefty. Yes pretend everything is a non issue, Christ I'm glad the libdems will never get in power.

You know I don't know anyone who'd spend so much time on a newspaper they hate like Vince. He to me is nothing but a troll & his actions here prove it

• Posted by: DefiantReport Comment

SHOULD ALL SIGNS IN BRITAIN BE IN ENGLISH?

17.12.07, 7:18pm

Before long you will have go to school to learn English in England!!!!

Roll on 2008 Cyprus here we come we are leaving England before it goes TITS UP!!!!!

• Posted by: FlyerReport Comment

OUI MADAME

14.12.07, 6:52pm

oui

• Posted by: alcoReport Comment

AND BACK TO THE ORIGINAL POINT...

13.12.07, 12:53pm

this whole 'sign's in english' was never an issue in the first place, but a non-issue put forward to stir hysteria about something that is not going to happen.

i like you pat, you're ok. i don't agree with what you think, but at least you make an effort.

• Posted by: VinceReport Comment

User Image

WELL DONE VINCE

13.12.07, 12:15pm

You are totally correct. What was I thinking of?

And you, all you 'no-hopers' on this site - how could you have all been so blind? Islam is NO WORSE than Christianity, Judaism or any other religion. Sorted.

You have won the argument Vince. Well done.

All signs in Britain should NOT be in English.

• Posted by: PatVReport Comment

WELL PAT

13.12.07, 11:30am

off the top of my head, i could recall when american christians threatened to kill the beatles, held huge album burning parties, etc. when john lennon said that the beatles were 'bigger than jesus'.

i could recall (and i can provide quotes if you want) when hitler said it was his mission as a christian to murder jewish people... oh, ok, here are some quotes:

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

and here is an interesting one which is resonant of the discussions on here:

Only a handful of Germans in the Reich had the slightest conception of the eternal and merciless struggle for the German language, German schools, and a German way of life. Only today, when the same deplorable misery is forced on many millions of Germans from the Reich, who under foreign rule dream of their common fatherland and strive, amid their longing, at least to preserve their holy right to their mother tongue, do wider circles understand what it means to be forced to fight for one's nationality.

-Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

so i'm glad you take my points on board. but in resonse i would say that, it has very likely always been the case that when people have makde large scale sweepig judgements on the basis of race, ethnicity and religion, they have always pretty much said... "you, well anyone can tell that these people are different, they are evil".

i personally won't buy it and won't accept it. sane people do not want war and conflict to rule their lives, so if loads of people believe in a faith, it would be unreasonable to suggest that that faith is not based on cruelty and war, but being twisted in that direction by a few. just like any other religion has been on occasion.



• Posted by: VinceReport Comment

User Image

VINCE

12.12.07, 8:43pm

I take your point about not wanting Britain to be a nazi state, but in all your posts you fail to address the point in question, and that is: MUSLIM HATRED IS NOT UNWARRANTED - IT'S FOR THE REASONS I DESCRIBED EARLIED. You just equate it with some sort of nebulus prejudice prevalent in the '60s and '70s based on skin colour, accent, etc. You say that all religions have their foibles and misrepresentatives, and that's true. But can you REALLY not see the difference is between Islam and all other religions. Do I need to send you some links to pictures (eg. 7/7, flag burnings or demonstrators' placards)?

If you wish to continue the discussion, then address this issue instead of introducing other spurious arguments. Or better still, send me some links to a picture of a mob of screaming Christians with placards saying "Behead those who insult Jesus", or a picture of Jews burning an Arab flag, any Arab flag, or a German flag, hell even a Nazi flag, or perhaps a picture of a Quaker rendering a bus into a banana split with explosives.

Until then, please don't bother coming back to me.

• Posted by: PatVReport Comment

PATV

12.12.07, 5:34pm

i say 'you people' because its pretty clear that there is a culture of xenophobia on this website. one i do not subscribe to, so yes, i would separate myself from 'you people' on many levels. in that case, it was an intellectual level, where the so-called 'defenders of britain' actually have very little clue about the history of britain (their own history), and yet, have the gall to suggest that i am upatriotic, or a traitor or whatever, becasue i challenge their bigoted views of this country and the world.

and yes, i never tire of the old fascist tactic: "he disagrees, we can't deal with his arguments, so we'll try to undermine him by suggesting he is a foreigner, that way it doesn't matter if we can't deal with his arguments"

tired, old, and sad.

you have to pick up your game, patv. while your at it, grow up too.

look around at the rhetoric you are supporting here, and look at the party that most of the people here would like to win the next election. this is a party whose leaders in the past have picked on blacks, and jewish people. now it is cynically convenient for them to turn their gaze to another 'foreign group' and immigrants in general in order to whip up a bit of support through hatred.

if you want to support that, then on your concience be it. but i won't put myself in league with people with that kind of history. I'll fight against it, even if that means having to show tolerance to faiths i couldn't give a moonbeam about, because i know what the results of that kind of language are.

• Posted by: VinceReport Comment

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year