Scottish Sunday Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 5°C
London
Tuesday 2nd December 2008 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

RosieInLondon

Location:London, East, GB
Age: 70
Gender: female
In a few words: I am an OAP living in London UK

They have to accept part of the blame.

Published: Tuesday September 16,2008 by RosieInLondon


When Nulabour won the election in 1997 they should have had a viable energy policy ready to run.

If they were going to use more nuclear then they should have had plans in place then. You can't build a nuclear power station over night.

Then there is proper house insulation, that should have been in hand, so that every house built after Jan 1 2000 was fully insulated cavity walls, full loft insulation, double glazing, and as they came on the market, no vat on energy saving light bulbs , and vat on standard light bulbs. The same with energy efficent white good, high tax on the less efficant and low or no tax on the high efficent appliences.

Also they should have put up care tax in the gas guzzlers, inc RR and Bentley's, with no tax on the under 1ltr engines.

All simple and easy to do.

of course they were after headlines and spin, not good sensible government. That policy has simply been carried on by Brown when he succeeded Blair.

So as far as the above goes then the government is responsible.

There were of course other things they could have done.

Inappropriate Comment?
Have a Story?

User Comments / Have Your Say

The opinions and views expressed in the above comment are purely those of the writer and in no way reflect the opinions or views of the Daily Express website, the Daily Express newspaper or Northern And Shell Media Publications. We accept no responsibilty legal or otherwise for the accurancy or truth of this comment.

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year